back

 

FY2005 GDOM


We compared data points within 10cm from the center only to eliminate the strange behaviors at the edge.

  • Description of the table

     

    PMTName QE337nm Before Compensation Compensation Mode After Compensation
    sim-data[%] fig shift x[nm] sim-data[%] fig
    TA1052 0.2459 4.31 [diff] [0~168deg] [180~348deg] -10.0 0.09856 [diff] [0~168deg] [180~348deg]
    TA1059 0.2396 4.7 [diff] [0~168deg] [180~348deg] -10.0 0.7882 [diff] [0~168deg] [180~348deg]
    TA1062 0.2402 2.54 [diff] [0~168deg] [180~348deg] -6.5 0.0859 [diff] [0~168deg] [180~348deg]
    TA1069 0.2383 3.431 [diff] [0~168deg] [180~348deg] -8.5 0.1711 [diff] [0~168deg] [180~348deg]
    TA1167 0.2254 3.475 [diff] [0~168deg] [180~348deg] -9 0.1057 [diff] [0~168deg] [180~348deg]



    DOM 2D Map Subtraction


    We subtracted real DOM 2D Map from simulated DOM 2D Map.
    The left three figures are the case before compensation and the right three figures are the case after compensation.

    TA1052

    337nm
    Simulation - Data = Difference
    Simulation - Data = Difference

    TA1059

    337nm

    TA1062

    337nm

    TA1069

    337nm

    TA1167

    337nm
    back
  • Analysis by Kotoyo in 2005