using (nearly) all waveforms

Summary

Again the lightsaber (FADC) is the best. Although, this time, the lightsaber (ATWD) is not good at all.

Although (nearly) all the waveform is used, the improvement can't be seen comapred to only using 1 bin (npe sum in a DOM). This can mean that (1) simply our tables (parameterization) is wrong, (2)more possibly our continuous energy loss assumption is wrong, or (3) something else?

using K-function

ATWD

reconstructed energy resolution black: no dist cut blue: dist<500m	reconstructed energy resolution Vs distance
reconstructed energy Vs true energy (no dist cut)	reconstructed energy Vs true energy (dist<500m)
reconstructed energy resolution Vs true energy (no dist cut)	reconstructed energy resolution Vs true energy (dist<500m)
reconstructed energy resolution Vs zenith angle (no dist cut)	reconstructed energy resolution Vs zenith angle (dist<500m)

FADC

reconstructed energy resolution black: no dist cut blue: dist<500m	reconstructed energy resolution Vs distance
reconstructed energy Vs true energy (no dist cut)	reconstructed energy Vs true energy (dist<500m)
reconstructed energy resolution Vs true energy (no dist cut)	reconstructed energy resolution Vs true energy (dist<500m)
reconstructed energy resolution Vs zenith angle (no dist cut)	reconstructed energy resolution Vs zenith angle (dist<500m)

using lightsaber tables

ATWD

reconstructed energy resolution black: no dist cut blue: dist<500m	reconstructed energy resolution Vs distance
reconstructed energy Vs true energy (no dist cut)	reconstructed energy Vs true energy (dist<500m)
reconstructed energy resolution Vs true energy (no dist cut)	reconstructed energy resolution Vs true energy (dist<500m)
reconstructed energy resolution Vs zenith angle (no dist cut)	reconstructed energy resolution Vs zenith angle (dist<500m)

FADC

reconstructed energy resolution black: no dist cut blue: dist<500m	reconstructed energy resolution Vs distance
reconstructed energy Vs true energy (no dist cut)	reconstructed energy Vs true energy (dist<500m)
reconstructed energy resolution Vs true energy (no dist cut)	reconstructed energy resolution Vs true energy (dist<500m)
reconstructed energy resolution Vs zenith angle (no dist cut)	reconstructed energy resolution Vs zenith angle (dist<500m)

Keiichi Mase

Last modified: Thu Mar 6 15:25:08 JST 2008