(Wanna see the channel-wise results?)
Here, you see results from the 22 strings data.
I used data filtered by myself with a simple script that filters EHE events (#DOM>80).
I used the available data so far(July 7th - Sept. 13th).
The possible signal region is blinded (log10(total Npe)<5.).
Here, you see a script to make root files to analyze data.
The following OMs are ignored based on the level 1 filtering script.
("CleanedKeys",[OMKey(29,59),#Dead/problem list
OMKey(29,60),
OMKey(30,23),
OMKey(30,60),
OMKey(38,59),
OMKey(39,22),
OMKey(50,36),
OMKey(74,9),
OMKey(40,51),
OMKey(40,52),
OMKey(46,49),
OMKey(46,50),
OMKey(46,53),
OMKey(46,54),
OMKey(46,55),
OMKey(46,56),
OMKey(47,55),
OMKey(47,56),
OMKey(56,57),
OMKey(56,58),
OMKey(72,37),
OMKey(72,38),
OMKey(39,8), #Dark Noise mode only DOMS
OMKey(50,58),
OMKey(72,33),
OMKey(72,34),
OMKey(72,35),
OMKey(72,36),
OMKey(72,43),])
Let me summerize at first. The data generaly looks fine.
The data are consistent with a MC based on the last year's study.
There is some period where the event rate is about half lower. (1.76e7 < UTC <1.83e7)
We should check more and know the reason. Azriel pointed me out that this is due to the prescaling to 2 to save the bandwidth at the period.
Duration time in each file (not run!). |
Duration time in each run. |
|
The cumulative duration time. The effective time increases linialy with time, and ~61.7 days in total (so far). There is some period where the prescaling was applied (around 1.8e7 UTC). So, the slope is different for the period. Flasher data are not included (run# 108895, 108896, 108911 and 108912). |
Event # Vs Run ID |
|
The event rate. It's about 1.3 Hz. There is some data with low rate... There is a correlation between event rate and the duration time (See above plot.(left)). |
The event rate for each Npe cut. |
|
I simply multiplied the rate by factor 2 for the prescaled
period (red points). |
The event rate for each Npe cut after simple prescaling correction (multiply factor 2). |
|
Prescale correction for the prescaled period (green points). |
The event rate for each Npe cut after prescaling correction . |
|
Time difference between events. The slope value is consistent with the rate. There is some tail (mainly due to data of prescaling period). The slope is -1.25. |
Same as left. With log10(total Npe)>3. The slope is -0.123. This is also consistent with the rate. |
Same as left. With log10(total Npe)>3.5. The slope is -0.0057. This is also consistent with the rate. |
Same as above without prescaled data. (cut 1.76e7 < UTC <1.83e7). The tail becomes smaller. (Although, I should probably clean data more.) The slope is -1.30. |
Same as left without prescaled data. With log10(total Npe)>3. The slope is -0.128. |
Same as left without prescaled data. With log10(total Npe)>3.5.
The slope is -0.0059. |
Time difference between events. |
Time difference between events. |
Total Npe |
Hit DOM number |
DOM number Vs total NPE |
Total FADC Npe Vs total ATWD Npe |
Npe distribution |
Keiichi Mase Last modified: Sat Nov 10 15:25:52 JST 2007