DOM Launch time check


Introduction

I found three peaks in the DOM launch time during the data check.

The second peak (about 6 micro sec later from the main peak) is understood as the launch that had the first launch but couldn't satisfy the local conincidence condition (neighbor didn't got launched), so the first launch wasn't recorded.

Howerver, there is a third peak at around 25000 ns

Since I only plot here the first launch (the second or later was cleaned by a procedure), the peak should not corresponds neither second nor third launch.

Checking more

I then checked the 2nd launch or more, that are ignored in the previous analysis. For this study, I only used data of run# 108981 (August 1st, 2007) (EHE filtered data (DOM#>80)).

In fact, I could not find any 3rd launch in the data.

Launch time distributions for events that have 2 launches.
black: 1st launch
blue: 2nd launch
There are 3 peaks structure for the 2nd launch, too
The 2nd peak time of 1st launch doesn't match with the 1st peak time of 2nd launch completely.

Correlation between the first and the second launch for events that have two launches.
Functions of y=x and y=x+6400 are plotted.
There are clear correlations between peaks of the 1st and 2nd launch time.
You see also a clear 6.4 micro sec delay.

These results are consistent with the hypothisis of that the 2nd peak is due to DOMs that launched but didn't have neighbors to satisfy the local coincidence condition.

However, I don't know how the 3rd peak is formed.

The 3rd peak

In order to know the nature of the 3rd peak, I plotted the position of DOMs for 3rd peak.

You see that the 3 peak events are correlated in a string.

I also checked those events by the event-viewer, taking those events randomly.

Run#: 108981, ID: 43173

Run#: 108981, ID: 64704

Run#: 108981, ID: 125411

Run#: 108981, ID: 240136

Run#: 108981, ID: 247122

Run#: 108981, ID: 285772

Run#: 108981, ID: 293385

Run#: 108981, ID: 309474

Run#: 108981, ID: 342062

Run#: 108981, ID: 432692

At first, those events are related to physical events and not just noises.

Some of those events looks quite OK. Most of them looks double coincident events, though the first event looks smaller than the following one (can be due to low statistics). I am not 100% sure this early coming events are really physical one. This can be noise. (cross-talk?) I also don't understand why those events make the 3rd peak in launch time if they are really double coincident events.

Comments are welcome!


Keiichi Mase
Last modified: Sat Nov 10 15:25:52 JST 2007